- Eyes can't really be compared to video cameras (or at least, they make for a poor comparison). They function in different ways and process images differently and store data by different means, making them difficult to compare.
- Eyes make for extremely crappy cameras. So many flaws and obstructions of view, blind spots and blurs, and all that jazz. If our eyes were cameras, we would return them.
- To many frames per second can actually give you a headache. This is why, when something is moving to fast for your eyes to see, your eyes add in a motion blur. Without this motion blur, the eyes would get confused and your noggin will start aching.
- I never realized that eyes produced such a crappy quality "image"
- Another point for technology for surpassing human limitations
Why is it that, at the point of optimal vision, fewer "megapixels" can be perceived than outside of that point? If the optimal point is compared to 7 megapixels, shouldn't the points outside of this be compared to 6 or less, since it isn't quite as clear? And does that take into consideration the blind spot where no visual data can be drawn from?
No comments:
Post a Comment